ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750
- 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
- Around 60% better floating-point performance: 440.0 gflops vs 275.71 gflops
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 38 Watt
Pipelines | 400 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 440.0 gflops vs 275.71 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 38 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1436 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 1436 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1937 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1937 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 645 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 53 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Madison | GT215 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1386 | 1387 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 1436 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 440.0 gflops | 275.71 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 11 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 38 Watt |
Transistor count | 627 million | 727 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Gigaflops | 413 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Single Link DVILVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortVGA |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR, GDDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |