ATI Radeon HD 5490 vs NVIDIA NVS 510
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5490 and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5490
- Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 35 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 192 vs 80
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1000 MHz
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5490
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5490 | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 685 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1699 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.809 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 111.269 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.399 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.769 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.522 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 976 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5490 | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Cedar | GK107 |
| Launch date | 28 October 2012 | 23 October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1450 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 80 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 160 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |