ATI Radeon X800 PRO vs NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon X800 PRO and NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 PRO
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 5.7 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 130 nm vs 150 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 13x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 65 vs 5
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 May 2004 vs 19 February 2002 |
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 5.7 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 65 vs 5 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 190
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 190 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon X800 PRO
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon X800 PRO | NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 65 | 5 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 190 | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon X800 PRO | NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | R400 | Kelvin |
| Code name | R423 | NV25 A2 |
| Launch date | 1 May 2004 | 19 February 2002 |
| Place in performance rating | 945 | 948 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 150 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 5.7 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 48 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 160 million | 63 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0c | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |