ATI Rage XL vs NVIDIA Riva TNT
Comparative analysis of ATI Rage XL and NVIDIA Riva TNT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Rage XL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 125 MHz vs 90 MHz
| Launch date | 1 August 1998 vs 23 March 1998 |
| Core clock speed | 125 MHz vs 90 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Riva TNT
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 180.0 MTexel / s vs 125.0 MTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 MB vs 8 MB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 110 MHz vs 83 MHz
| Texture fill rate | 180.0 MTexel / s vs 125.0 MTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 16 MB vs 8 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 110 MHz vs 83 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Rage XL | NVIDIA Riva TNT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Code name | Rage XL | NV4 |
| Launch date | 1 August 1998 | 23 March 1998 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architecture | Fahrenheit | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 125 MHz | 90 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 350 nm | 350 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 125.0 MTexel / s | 180.0 MTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 8 million | 7 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCI | AGP 2x |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 MB | 16 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 664 MB / s | 1.76 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 83 MHz | 110 MHz |
| Memory type | SDR | SDR |