Apple M1 Ultra 48-core vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 Ultra 48-core and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 Ultra 48-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 94657 vs 59912
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 Mar 2022 vs 4 Aug 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 94657 vs 59912 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- 53.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 48
Pipelines | 2560 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 Ultra 48-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Apple M1 Ultra 48-core | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 94657 | 59912 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Apple M1 Ultra 48-core | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 18 Mar 2022 | 4 Aug 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 178 | 179 |
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | |
Code name | Navi 10 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.925 TFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 48 | 2560 |
Render output units | 192 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 130 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz | |
Compute units | 40 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s | |
Transistor count | 10300 million | |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 819.2 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 256 bit |
Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan |