Intel GMA 3100 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
Comparative analysis of Intel GMA 3100 and ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 HD videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA 3100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
| Launch date | 9 May 2007 vs 1 March 2007 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 479 MHz vs 400 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 90 nm
| Core clock speed | 479 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 90 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel GMA 3100
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
| Name | Intel GMA 3100 | ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 HD |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 49 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel GMA 3100 | ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 HD | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 4.0 | R500 |
| Code name | Bearlake | M71 |
| Launch date | 9 May 2007 | 1 March 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 744 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 479 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | |
| Texture fill rate | 1.916 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 107 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 3.024 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 32 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 756 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR2 | |
