Intel GMA 3100 vs Intel GMA X3100
Comparative analysis of Intel GMA 3100 and Intel GMA X3100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA X3100
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 400 MHz
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel GMA 3100 | Intel GMA X3100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 4.0 | Generation 4.0 |
| Code name | Bearlake | Broadwater |
| Launch date | 9 May 2007 | 9 May 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | 13 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel GMA 3100 with others
IntelGMA 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8400M G
IntelGMA 3100 vs
IntelGMA X3100
IntelGMA 3100 vs
IntelGMA 3150
