Intel GMA X3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Comparative analysis of Intel GMA X3000 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA X3000
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 13 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 13 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel GMA X3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Name | Intel GMA X3000 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 48 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel GMA X3000 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 4.0 | Curie |
Code name | Broadwater | G72 |
Launch date | 1 June 2006 | 1 June 2006 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 736 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | 10 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Pipelines | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 1.2 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 112 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 4.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 600 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Memory type | 64 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |