Intel GMA X4500 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache

Comparative analysis of Intel GMA X4500 and NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel GMA X4500

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 52% higher core clock speed: 533 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 110 nm
Launch date 1 September 2008 vs 15 December 2004
Core clock speed 533 MHz vs 350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 110 nm

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel GMA X4500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache

Name Intel GMA X4500 NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache
PassMark - G3D Mark 52
PassMark - G2D Mark 46
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 88
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 88

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel GMA X4500 NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache

Essentials

Architecture Generation 5.0 Curie
Code name Eaglelake NV44 B2
Launch date 1 September 2008 15 December 2004
Place in performance rating not rated 1689
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 533 MHz 350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 110 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt
Texture fill rate 1.4 GTexel / s
Transistor count 75 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 AGP 4x
Length 165 mm

API support

DirectX 10.0 9.0c
OpenGL 2.0 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 64 MB
Memory bandwidth 5.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 700 MHz
Memory type DDR