Intel GMA X4500 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
Comparative analysis of Intel GMA X4500 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA X4500
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 533 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 533 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel GMA X4500 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 5.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Eaglelake | G96C |
| Launch date | 1 September 2008 | 27 August 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 533 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 44.8 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 16 | |
| Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 314 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCI |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR2 | |