Intel HD Graphics 2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 15% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 738 MHz
  • 72x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 11.81 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 55 nm
  • 8.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 52
  • Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 213 vs 160
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 January 2011 vs 10 March 2009
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 738 MHz
Texture fill rate 850 MTexel / s vs 11.81 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 55 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 456 vs 52
PassMark - G3D Mark 213 vs 160

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

  • 5.3x more pipelines: 32 vs 6
  • 11.5x better floating-point performance: 117.5 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1731 vs 1039
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1731 vs 1039
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 32 vs 6
Floating-point performance 117.5 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1731 vs 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1731 vs 1039

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1039
1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1039
1731
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
456
52
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
213
160
Name Intel HD Graphics 2000 NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1039 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1039 1731
PassMark - G2D Mark 456 52
PassMark - G3D Mark 213 160
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 179.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1813.265
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 13.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 757.451
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3689

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 2000 NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Generation 6.0 Tesla
Code name Sandy Bridge GT1 G96C
Launch date 5 January 2011 10 March 2009
Place in performance rating 683 684
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 850 MHz 738 MHz
Floating-point performance 10.2 gflops 117.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 6 32
Texture fill rate 850 MTexel / s 11.81 GTexel / s
Transistor count 189 million 314 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 10.1 10.0
OpenGL 3.1 3.3

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 16.13 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1008 MHz
Memory type DDR2