Intel HD Graphics 2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 16.8x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 50.6 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 55 nm
- 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 78
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 15 January 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s vs 50.6 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 vs 78 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 40x more pipelines: 240 vs 6
- 66.1x better floating-point performance: 673.9 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3195 vs 1039
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3195 vs 1039
- 6.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1414 vs 213
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Pipelines | 240 vs 6 |
Floating-point performance | 673.9 gflops vs 10.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 vs 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 vs 1039 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1414 vs 213 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1039 | 3195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1039 | 3195 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 | 78 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 213 | 1414 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 2000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 6.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Sandy Bridge GT1 | GT200B |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 15 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 687 | 1195 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1404 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 10.2 gflops | 673.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 6 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s | 50.6 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 448 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 127.0 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1134 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |