NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel HD Graphics 2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 224x more pipelines: 1344 vs 6
- 206.6x better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 20.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4327 vs 213
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 456
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 vs 1039
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 vs 1039
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 5 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 6 |
Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops vs 10.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4327 vs 213 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 vs 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 vs 1039 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 784 MHz
- 9.7x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 87.81 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 784 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s vs 87.81 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4327 | 213 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 456 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12186 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 | 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 | 1039 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Generation 6.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Sandy Bridge GT1 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 5 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $854.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 684 | 687 |
Price now | $446.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 784 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops | 10.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 6 |
Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s | 850 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 |