Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A380 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 817 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1282 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 606 vs 589
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 817 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1282 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 vs 589 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 153.8 GTexel/s vs 131.2 GTexel/s
- 3.8x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1024
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13253 vs 6242
- 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1821 vs 808
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78982 vs 38292
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 153.8 GTexel/s vs 131.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 1024 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13253 vs 6242 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1821 vs 808 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78982 vs 38292 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 | 589 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6242 | 13253 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 808 | 1821 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38292 | 78982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 330.903 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3461.767 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.167 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 143.293 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 979.608 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
Code name | DG2-128 | GA106 |
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 313 | 144 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1282 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 817 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | 9.846 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | 61.54 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 153.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 12000 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Portable Device Dependent |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 222 mm, 8.7 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 114 mm, 4.5 inches | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 186.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |