Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 606 vs 360
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 vs 23 April 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 vs 360 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 vs 6242
- 6.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4903 vs 808
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52263 vs 38292
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1024 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 vs 6242 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4903 vs 808 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52263 vs 38292 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 | 360 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6242 | 8609 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 808 | 4903 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38292 | 52263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Code name | DG2-128 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 | 23 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 313 | 315 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1335 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1140 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.202 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | 4.101 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | 64.08 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 128.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 6600 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 222 mm, 8.7 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Width | 114 mm, 4.5 inches | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 186.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Arc A380 with others
IntelArc A380 vs
AMDFireStream 9270
IntelArc A380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti
IntelArc A380 vs
AMDRadeon R9 390
IntelArc A380 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
IntelArc A380 vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 1024SP
IntelArc A380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
