Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A770 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 2.7x more core clock speed: 2100 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 86% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1290 MHz
• 3x more texture fill rate: 614.4 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 754 vs 645
• Around 30% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13627 vs 10457
• Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 108195 vs 92447
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 459.949 vs 449.647
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6139.427 vs 4619.617
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 38.046 vs 36.308
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1891.867 vs 1410.887

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4096
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15401 vs 13158
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.818 vs 77.897

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	754 645
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13158 15401
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	13627 10457
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	108195 92447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	459.949 449.647
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6139.427 4619.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.046 36.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.897 181.818
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1891.867 1410.887

Compare specifications (specs)