Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A770 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 614.4 GTexel/s vs 211.2 GTexel/s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
Texture fill rate | 614.4 GTexel/s vs 211.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 2100 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Launch date | 2023 vs 12 Oct 2022 |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 2100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 6 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
Name | Intel Arc A770 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13175 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2969 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 108639 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 552.246 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4822.738 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.001 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1958.986 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A770 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | DG2-512 | AD106 |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 98 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 2640 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2100 MHz | 2505 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.66 TFLOPS | 13.52 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 307.2 GPixel/s | 84.48 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 614.4 GTexel/s | 211.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 450 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |