Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A770 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Arc A770

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
2.1x more core clock speed: 2100 MHz vs 1005 MHz
2x more boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 552.246 vs 401.574

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 Oct 2022 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed	2100 MHz vs 1005 MHz
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	552.246 vs 401.574

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 880 vs 753
Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19862 vs 13175
Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 147317 vs 108639
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 4822.738
Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 36.277
11.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 19.001
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1958.986

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	880 vs 753
PassMark - G3D Mark	19862 vs 13175
Geekbench - OpenCL	147317 vs 108639
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	6432.348 vs 4822.738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	43.914 vs 36.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	215.219 vs 19.001
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2101.927 vs 1958.986

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A770
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

753

880

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13175

19862

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

108639

147317

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

552.246

401.574

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4822.738

6432.348

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

36.277

43.914

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.001

215.219

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1958.986

2101.927

Name	Intel Arc A770	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G2D Mark	753	880
PassMark - G3D Mark	13175	19862
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2969	0
Geekbench - OpenCL	108639	147317
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	552.246	401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4822.738	6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	36.277	43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.001	215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1958.986	2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3290

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Arc A770	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Code name	DG2-512	TU102
Launch date	12 Oct 2022	13 August 2018
Place in performance rating	98	96
Launch price (MSRP)		$9,999
Type		Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	1200 MHz
Core clock speed	2100 MHz	1005 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	12 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	39.32 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	19.66 TFLOPS
Pipelines	4096
Pixel fill rate	307.2 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	614.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	21700 million	18,600 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6