Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A30M and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A30M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 722 MHz
- 1846.8x more texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel/s vs 69.31 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 696 vs 556
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5862 vs 3568
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 722 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel/s vs 69.31 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 696 vs 556 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5862 vs 3568 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A30M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc Pro A30M | NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30987 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 696 | 556 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5862 | 3568 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc Pro A30M | NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | DG2-128 | GM204 |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 30 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 196 | 195 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 722 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,024 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.096 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 64.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel/s | 69.31 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 5,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |