Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A40 and NVIDIA Quadro M600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- 6051.2x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33073 vs 5983
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 18 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33073 vs 5983 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A40
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc Pro A40 | NVIDIA Quadro M600M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33073 | 5983 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2171 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc Pro A40 | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell |
Code name | DG2-128 | GM107 |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 18 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 689 | 692 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 870.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.963 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.482 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 54.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel/s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.0 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |