Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) vs AMD Radeon 780M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) and AMD Radeon 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
- 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1150 vs 480
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1150 vs 480 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 139.2 GTexel/s vs 48.00 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 10 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 4 Jan 2022 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s vs 48.00 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 10 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 780M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | AMD Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1150 | 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | RDNA 3.0 |
Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | Phoenix |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 4 Jan 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 1108 | 240 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 2900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 4 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 24.00 GPixel/s | 92.80 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 GTexel/s | 139.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compute units | 12 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | IGP |
Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |