Intel Iris Graphics 5100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 747 vs 444
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 270 vs 118
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4032 vs 2465
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 9 January 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 747 vs 444 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 270 vs 118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4032 vs 2465 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
- 3.9x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 2.4x more pipelines: 96 vs 40
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2843 vs 1019
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2843 vs 1019
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1668
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1668
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 40 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2843 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2843 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 1668 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 747 | 444 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 270 | 118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4032 | 2465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1019 | 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1019 | 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1668 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1668 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1019 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | GF117 |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 9 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1184 | 1185 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 775 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 585 million |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |