Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and AMD Radeon R7 M260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz
  • 3900.7x more texture fill rate: 88.00 GTexel/s vs 22.56 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 vs 11 June 2014
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz
Texture fill rate 88.00 GTexel/s vs 22.56 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 28 nm

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260

  • 3.1x more core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed 940 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260

Name Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU AMD Radeon R7 M260
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1243
PassMark - G3D Mark 517
PassMark - G2D Mark 125
Geekbench - OpenCL 5125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 145.3
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 77.895
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1704

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU AMD Radeon R7 M260

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.0 GCN 3.0
Code name Tiger Lake GT2 Topaz
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 11 June 2014
Place in performance rating 1056 1479
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $799
Price now $799
Value for money (0-100) 1.33

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 980 MHz
Compute units 80 6
Core clock speed 300 MHz 940 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 352.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 2.816 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1408 GFLOPS
Pipelines 640 384
Pixel fill rate 22.00 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 88.00 GTexel/s 22.56 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Floating-point performance 721.9 gflops
Transistor count 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 2.1 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.3
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 32 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
Zero Core
ZeroCore