Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 20x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1243 vs 62
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 vs 62 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 | 62 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 September 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1056 | 1380 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 352.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.816 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1408 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |