Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 29333.3x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 3.6 billion / sec
- 48x more pipelines: 768 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 17 April 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s vs 3.6 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 768 vs 16 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 459 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 459 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 140 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 156 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 23 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1791 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 224 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 224 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 445 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 445 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | G86 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1695 | 1693 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $29.99 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.68 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 459 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 80 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 16 |
Pixel fill rate | 26.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | 3.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 29.376 gflops | |
Transistor count | 210 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR2 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
SLI |