Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and ATI Radeon 9200 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 239 MHz
- 26.4x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 956 MTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 135
- 285.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 856 vs 3
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 1 May 2003 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 239 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s vs 956 MTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 28 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 vs 135 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 856 vs 3 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | ATI Radeon 9200 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3300 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1633 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1633 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 135 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 856 | 3 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 617 | ATI Radeon 9200 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 7 |
| Code name | Amber Lake GT2 | RV280 |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 1 May 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1233 | 1231 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 239 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s | 956 MTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Transistor count | 36 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 8.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 5.25 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 328 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 617 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
ATIRadeon 9200
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
