Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 875x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 1 September 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 3300
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1313
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1313
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 1461
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 1461
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1633
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1633
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 230
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 856
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 vs 3300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 vs 1313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 vs 1313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 vs 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 vs 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 1633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 1633 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 vs 230 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 vs 856 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3300 | 4657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1633 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1633 | 3309 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 299 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 856 | 1237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | Amber Lake GT2 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1233 | 1234 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||


