Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and NVIDIA Quadro 500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 1392.9x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1573 vs 571
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 365
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 22 February 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 vs 571 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 vs 365 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 500M
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8743 vs 5967
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8743 vs 5967 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 500M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | NVIDIA Quadro 500M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 571 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 365 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 8743 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 730 | NVIDIA Quadro 500M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Fermi |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 22 February 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 633 | 630 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price now | $275.14 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.18 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Compute units | 24 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 11.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
