Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 19 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.5x more boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 1733.3x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 192 vs 20
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 9.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1573 vs 171
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 275
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 18 April 2006 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 375 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s vs 9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 20 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 vs 171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 vs 275 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 375 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 375 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 275 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 730 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Curie |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | G71 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 18 April 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 633 | 632 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 375 MHz |
| Compute units | 24 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 375 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 20 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 278 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-II |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 500 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 32.0 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory type | 256 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
