Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 156.8x more texture fill rate: 27.60 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 2 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 7.3x more pipelines: 2816 vs 384
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13758 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 852 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 2 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 310 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | |
| Code name | GM200 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $679.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Compute units | 48 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 220.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.766 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 883.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 GTexel/s | 176 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 250 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 2816 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 8,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 3 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48 EU) vs
AMDRadeon 660M
IntelUHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48 EU) vs
AMDRadeon 680M
IntelUHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Graphics 384SP
