Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU) vs ATI Mobility Radeon X600 SE
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU) and ATI Mobility Radeon X600 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 17 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 28000x more texture fill rate: 44.80 GTexel/s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 130 nm
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 1 June 2004 |
| Texture fill rate | 44.80 GTexel/s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 130 nm |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X600 SE
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X600 SE
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU) | ATI Mobility Radeon X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 49 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU) | ATI Mobility Radeon X600 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 1 June 2004 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 784 |
| Architecture | Rage 9 | |
| Code name | M24 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 130 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 358.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.867 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1434 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 44.80 GTexel/s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 75 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 3 | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 9.0b |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon 680M
IntelUHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Graphics 384SP
IntelUHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU) vs
IntelUHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48 EU)
