Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Intel HD Graphics P630
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and Intel HD Graphics P630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 32 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1887 vs 979
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1887 vs 979
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 vs 2158
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 vs 2158
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3049
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3049
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 5 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 32 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 vs 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 vs 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3049 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P630
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P630
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | Intel HD Graphics P630 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3049 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1224 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4868 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | Intel HD Graphics P630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 5 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 859 | 1032 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Shared memory | Yes | 1 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 |