NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 609.1 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 40 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 200738 vs 167014
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 27823 vs 3716
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 27823 vs 3716
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 51880 vs 3356
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 51880 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 40 GB vs 10 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200738 vs 167014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 27823 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 27823 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 51880 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 51880 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 26% higher pipelines: 8704 vs 6912
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 320 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 21006
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 21006
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 14 May 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Pipelines | 8704 vs 6912 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 21006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 21006 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200738 | 167014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21006 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21006 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 27823 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 27823 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 51880 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 51880 | 3356 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA100 | GA102 |
Launch date | 14 May 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 7 | 56 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 9.746 TFLOPS (1:2) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 77.97 TFLOPS (4:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.49 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6912 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 225.6 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 320 Watt |
Transistor count | 54200 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 40 GB | 10 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 1555 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 5120 bit | 320 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | HBM2e | GDDR6X |