NVIDIA A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A40 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 584.6 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s
- Around 24% higher pipelines: 10752 vs 8704
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 320 Watt
- 4.8x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 53% higher memory clock speed: 1812 MHz (14.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 193594 vs 167014
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 Oct 2020 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 584.6 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10752 vs 8704 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 48 GB vs 10 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1812 MHz (14.5 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193594 vs 167014 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1305 MHz
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1041 vs 627
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25232 vs 14665
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1305 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 vs 627 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25232 vs 14665 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A40
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA A40 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193594 | 167014 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 627 | 1041 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14665 | 25232 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17755 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA A40 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA102 | GA102 |
Launch date | 5 Oct 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 54 | 55 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1305 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1169 GFLOPS (1:32) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 37.42 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 37.42 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10752 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 194.9 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 584.6 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 320 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 48 GB | 10 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 695.8 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 320 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1812 MHz (14.5 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |