NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 40HX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 40HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 1011.5x more texture fill rate: 237.6 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 94577 vs 48090
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 vs 27 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 237.6 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 94577 vs 48090 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 185 Watt
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 40HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA CMP 40HX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 94577 | 48090 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11415 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17105 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17105 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6008 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU106 | GP104 |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 179 | 181 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 105.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 237.6 GTexel/s | 234.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 7,516 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 320.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 10008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |