NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 40HX and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 40HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1560 MHz
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 237.6 GTexel/s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 185 Watt
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 237.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 40HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Name | NVIDIA CMP 40HX | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 95766 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12207 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU106 | TU104 |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 174 | 170 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1110 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 105.6 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 237.6 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 13600 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |