NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 40HX and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 40HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 78% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 4013.5x more texture fill rate: 237.6 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 95902 vs 70535
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 237.6 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 95902 vs 70535 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 185 Watt
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 40HX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA CMP 40HX | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 95902 | 70535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6316 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6316 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 173 | 172 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 105.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 237.6 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 2,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |