NVIDIA GRID K140Q vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K140Q and NVIDIA Quadro CX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K140Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 602 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 454
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 602 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 454 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro CX
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 vs 728
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 vs 728 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K140Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro CX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K140Q | NVIDIA Quadro CX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 728 | 947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 | 454 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K140Q | NVIDIA Quadro CX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK107 | GT200B |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | $1,999 |
Place in performance rating | 343 | 340 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 602 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | 38.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |