NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q vs NVIDIA GRID K120Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q and NVIDIA GRID K120Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- 5.1x better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1756 vs 293
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 2 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1756 vs 293 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K120Q
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 278 vs 228
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 278 vs 228 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K120Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q | NVIDIA GRID K120Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 | 278 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1756 | 293 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q | NVIDIA GRID K120Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK107 |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 2 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 572 | 575 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |