NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR vs ATI Rage Mobility-M3
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR and ATI Rage Mobility-M3 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 120 MHz vs 105 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 480 MTexel / s vs 210.0 MTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 220 nm vs 250 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 MB vs 8 MB
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 143 MHz vs 105 MHz
Core clock speed | 120 MHz vs 105 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 480 MTexel / s vs 210.0 MTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 220 nm vs 250 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 MB vs 8 MB |
Memory clock speed | 143 MHz vs 105 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR | ATI Rage Mobility-M3 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Celsius | Rage 4 |
Code name | NV10 A3 | M3 |
Launch date | 11 October 1999 | 1 October 1999 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 120 MHz | 105 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 220 nm | 250 nm |
Texture fill rate | 480 MTexel / s | 210.0 MTexel / s |
Transistor count | 17 million | 8 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x VGA | 1x DB13W3 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 2x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 7.0 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 8 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 1.144 GB / s | 840 MB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 143 MHz | 105 MHz |
Memory type | SDR | SDR |