NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR vs ATI Rage Fury MAXX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR and ATI Rage Fury MAXX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 220 nm vs 250 nm
Manufacturing process technology | 220 nm vs 250 nm |
Reasons to consider the ATI Rage Fury MAXX
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 125 MHz vs 120 MHz
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 250.0 MTexel / s billion / sec vs 480 MTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 32 MB vs 32 MB
Core clock speed | 125 MHz vs 120 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 250.0 MTexel / s billion / sec vs 480 MTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 2x 32 MB vs 32 MB |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR | ATI Rage Fury MAXX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Celsius | Rage 4 |
Code name | NV10 A3 | Rage 4 |
Launch date | 11 October 1999 | 1 October 1999 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 120 MHz | 125 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 220 nm | 250 nm |
Texture fill rate | 480 MTexel / s | 2x 250.0 MTexel / s billion / sec |
Transistor count | 17 million | 8 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x VGA | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 7.0 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 2x 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 1.144 GB / s | 2x 1.144 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 2x 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 143 MHz | 143 MHz |
Memory type | SDR | SDR |