NVIDIA GeForce 615 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 615 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 615

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 75 Watt
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 128

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 May 2012 vs 1 February 2010
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	49 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	312 vs 128

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

2.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 660 MHz
7.2x more texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 5.28 GTexel / s
2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
3x better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 636 vs 546
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2172 vs 1708
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2172 vs 1708

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1500 MHz vs 660 MHz
Texture fill rate	38 billion / sec vs 5.28 GTexel / s
Pipelines	128 vs 48
Floating-point performance	384.0 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	636 vs 546
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2172 vs 1708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2172 vs 1708

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

546

636

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

312

128

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1708

2172

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1708

2172

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 615	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
PassMark - G3D Mark	546	636
PassMark - G2D Mark	312	128
Geekbench - OpenCL	1162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1708	2172
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1708	2172

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 615	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla
Code name	GF108	G92
Launch date	15 May 2012	1 February 2010
Place in performance rating	1293	1294
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	660 MHz	1500 MHz
Floating-point performance	126.7 gflops	384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	48	128
Texture fill rate	5.28 GTexel / s	38 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	49 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	754 million
CUDA cores		128
Gigaflops		576
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size		large
MXM Type		MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	61 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
HybridPower
Power management		8.0