NVIDIA GeForce 615 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 615 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 602 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 64

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

• 7.3x more texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
• 3.6x better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
• Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 986 vs 514
• 11.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15302 vs 1324
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1708
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1708

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	514 986
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	301 64
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1324 15302
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1708 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1708 3358

Compare specifications (specs)