NVIDIA GeForce 710A vs NVIDIA GeForce 710M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710A and NVIDIA GeForce 710M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710A

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 473 vs 459
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 198 vs 125
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2638 vs 2445
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.071 vs 6.51
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.636 vs 0.577
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.803 vs 11.718
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.162 vs 19.855
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1112 vs 1030
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1112 vs 1030

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M

• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 11.5 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 276.1 gflops
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 148.156 vs 141.919
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 1967
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 1967

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 710M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	473 459
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	198 125
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2638 2445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.071 6.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.919 148.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.636 0.577
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.803 11.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.162 19.855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1112 1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1967 3075
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1112 1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1967 3075

Compare specifications (specs)