NVIDIA GeForce 810A vs AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810A and AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 192 vs 160
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 280.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 18 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 655 vs 277
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 202
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 21 December 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops vs 280.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 18 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 655 vs 277 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 vs 202 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 775 MHz
Core clock speed | 875 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 810A | AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 655 | 277 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 | 202 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1828 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 810A | AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK208 | Caicos |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 858 | 816 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 875 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 280.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 18 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |