NVIDIA GeForce 810A vs NVIDIA GRID K520

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810A and NVIDIA GRID K520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 810A

NVIDIA GRID K520

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810A

Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 4% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 745 MHz
15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 319 vs 160

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 July 2014 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	775 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	319 vs 160

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520

169.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 12.4 GTexel / s
16x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 192
16.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
8x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB
2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 622
5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10864 vs 1828

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 1536 vs 192
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
Maximum memory size	2x 4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3516 vs 622
Geekbench - OpenCL	10864 vs 1828

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K520

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

622

3516

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

319

160

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1828

10864

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 810A	NVIDIA GRID K520
PassMark - G3D Mark	622	3516
PassMark - G2D Mark	319	160
Geekbench - OpenCL	1828	10864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		20.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1063.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.244
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		42.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		76.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		6782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		6782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3354

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 810A	NVIDIA GRID K520
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GK208	GK104
Launch date	22 July 2014	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	752	760
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,599
Technical info
Core clock speed	775 MHz	745 MHz
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	2x 2,448 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	192	2x 1536
Texture fill rate	12.4 GTexel / s	2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count		3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2x 4 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	2x 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5