NVIDIA GeForce 810A vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810A and NVIDIA GRID K220Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810A
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q
- 7.7x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 192
- 7.7x better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 912 vs 622
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 319
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 912 vs 622 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 vs 319 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 810A | NVIDIA GRID K220Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 622 | 912 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 | 539 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1828 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 833 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 833 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2660 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2660 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 810A | NVIDIA GRID K220Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK208 | GK104 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 2 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 752 | 753 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |