NVIDIA GeForce 810A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810A and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 360 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
- 12.9x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 23.04 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 7.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 655 vs 84
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 12 September 2007 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 360 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops vs 23.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 655 vs 84 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 277
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 277 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 810A | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 655 | 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 | 385 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1828 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 628 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 628 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 810A | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GK208 | G84 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 12 September 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 864 | 861 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Price now | $92.75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 360 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 23.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 2.88 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 289 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |