NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G vs ATI Radeon HD 3450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G and ATI Radeon HD 3450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 38 vs 25
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 10 December 2007 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 vs 25 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3450
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 5x more pipelines: 40 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 157 vs 58
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 735 vs 328
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 735 vs 328
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 40 vs 8 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 157 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 735 vs 328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 735 vs 328 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3450
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G | ATI Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 58 | 157 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 | 25 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 328 | 735 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 328 | 735 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G | ATI Radeon HD 3450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Code name | MCP77MV MCP79MVL | RV620 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 10 December 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1676 | 1673 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | TeraScale | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 8 | 40 |
| Floating-point performance | 48 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 2.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 181 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR2 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G with others
NVIDIAGeForce 8200M G vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6600
NVIDIAGeForce 8200M G vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6200 TurboCache
NVIDIAGeForce 8200M G vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7600 GS
NVIDIAGeForce 8200M G vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7300 LE
NVIDIAGeForce 8200M G vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9200
NVIDIAGeForce 8200M G vs
ATIRadeon HD 3450
