NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 825M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 8.4x more texture fill rate: 30.11 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
- 10x better floating-point performance: 722.7 gflops vs 72 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 782 vs 135
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops vs 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 782 vs 135 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 247
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 247 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 782 | 135 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 377 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1654 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1654 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 825M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GK208 | M92 |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 | 9 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 795 | 797 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s | 3.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |